Sunday, March 18, 2012

Stunning percentage agrees with Sheriff Joe

Stunning percentage agrees with Sheriff Joe


Editor’s note: This is another in a series of “WND/WENZEL POLLS” conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.
Half of Americans are unconvinced that Barack Obama’s birth certificate, released in 2011 at the White House amidst fanfare and proclamation that it is “proof positive” of Obama’s eligibility to be president, is authentic.
About the same number disbelieve his eligibility to be president, and the skeptics also say he has not provided adequate and “authentic” documentation about his qualifications to sit as commander in chief in the Oval Office.
The confirmation numbers are the newest on the long running debate over Obama’s eligibility and occupancy of the presidency, and are from a WND/Wenzel Poll conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.
The scientific telephone survey was conducted March 10-13 and has a margin of error of 3.72 percentage points.
The poll reveals that nearly 33 percent of the respondents say they do not believe Obama has “provided adequate and authentic documentation that he is qualified to serve as president.”
And another 14 percent say they are uncertain whether he has.
NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” you can view it here.
The numbers show 52.8 percent say Obama has provided that documentation.
The statistics are very nearly the same for related questions. While 54 percent said they believe Obama is eligible, 29.8 percent simply said that he is not. And another 16 percent had doubts about the issue enough that they could not ascertain that answer.
Also, while 50 percent say his long form birth certificate is real, 25 percent say it is a fake and 24 percent say they just can’t determine.
“Much has been written over the past three years about the Obama administration’s dismissive approach to the U.S. Constitution, but there is little as shocking as the findings of this latest survey that nearly half of the registered voters in American believe the president is not legally qualified to serve,” said Fritz Wenzel in his analysis of the results.
“Even among the most liberal Americans – his most ardent supporters – more than 20 percent said they think he is not eligible, yet there is no outrage or protests in the streets. There is simply no way to describe this situation because it is unlike any we have ever seen before,” he said.
“Politically, the findings on this subject spell potential disaster for the Obama re-election campaign in that one in three independent voters does not believe Obama has provided enough documentation to prove he is legally eligible to hold the presidency,” Wenzel said. “These people will not be voting for him.
“This is a substantial bloc of what we think to be swing voters to have taken off the table right from the beginning, and it spells political disaster for the White House.”
However, he noted that Obama is not the only one at fault.
“That no serious action has been taken in Washington to confront this issue paints a sad picture of the impotence or spinelessness of the president’s political opponents and a pathetic portrait of a nation’s citizens who are mostly content to sit idly by while an apparent imposter raids their national treasury and runs their once-great nation into the ground,” Wenzel said.
In fact, a recent law enforcement investigation by a Cold Case Posse assembled by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., revealed that there is probable cause to believe there was forgery committed in the creation of the Obama document, and fraud in presenting it as a real certificate.
The sheriff has confirmed that investigation by professional law enforcement officers and attorneys is continuing, with a focus being on the person who created the document image.
The latest poll results followed a recent poll by Public Policy Polling of GOP primary voters in three battleground states.
The poll asked whether voters think Obama was born in the United States, or not?
Thirty-seven percent of Republican primary voters in Ohio, 38 percent of them in Georgia and a startling 45 percent of them in Tennessee said they don’t believe he was. And another large percentage, some 1 in 5, have doubts so that they cannot say for sure they believe him.
The issue is that while the Constitution requires a president to be a “natural born citizen” the documentation that would reveal that for Obama remains unrevealed.
Obama has refused to allow access to whatever original documentation there might be in the state of Hawaii, where he said he was born, as well as many other documents, such as passport records, kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records and schedules, medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license and adoption records.
There also are his critics who say that “natural born citizen” at the time the Constitution was written would have meant the offspring of two citizens of the country, and since Obama’s father was a foreign national, he would not qualify under that standard.
The WND/Wenzel poll also addressed that, revealing that half of Americans believe that to be natural born requires being born in the U.S., and one in five believes it means that both parents must be citizens.
Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen.
Back when the Iowa caucuses were being held a Public Policy Polling report noted that one in three Iowa GOP members do not believe Obama was born in the United States – an indication of their disbelief about his eligibility to be president.
WND also reported that another recent poll showed half of registered voters would like to see Congress investigate Obama’s eligibility. It also showed nearly that many believe the definition of the constitutional term “natural born citizen” means both parents must be U.S. citizens.
At that time, Wenzel noted, “Even among Democrats, more than one in four – 28 percent – said they now want an inquiry, as do 43 percent of independents and 77 percent of Republicans.”
The eligibility saga, as Wenzel noted, has taken on a life of its own. It began with questions about Obama’s birth place and parentage before his election. At that time, he released a computer image of a short-form “Certification of Live Birth” from Hawaii and insisted it was original and the only document available.
Then last April, just as a new book, “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President,” by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., reached the No. 1 spot on Amazon and was about to be released, Obama took a dramatic step.
He instructed his White House counsel, Robert Bauer, to have a private attorney, Judy Corley of Perkins Coie, contact the Hawaii Department of Health to obtain a copy of his “Certificate of Live Birth” purportedly on file with the state.
The White House subsequently released copies of a copy of the document, as well as an online image, calling it “proof positive” of a Hawaii birth. Since then, however, dozens of experts, including Arpaio and several ex-CIA members, have asserted that the document is fraudulent.
The image:
At its release, WND contacted the Hawaii Health Department and the office of Gov. Neil Abercrombie, an ardent Obama supporter, to request confirmation that the image released was an accurate representation of the state’s file information. Officials declined to respond.
A constitutional expert recently weighed in on the the issue and concluded that the obvious meaning of the term “natural born citizen,” which is not defined in the Constitution, is someone who obtains citizenship naturally, from citizen parents, and not from any act of Congress or other affirmative action.
Just days after the White House released the “birth certificate” image, Gallup reported that only 47 percent thought Obama was definitely was born in the U.S. and 18 percent said he “probably” was.
Obama released the image saying he had no time for such silliness as questions about his birth, then departed for an appearance on Oprah’s television show.
It was only a few months after Obama’s inauguration that a WND/Wenzel Poll showed that 51.3 percent of Americans said they were aware of the questions raised about Obama’s constitutional eligibility for office. Only 18.7 percent said they were not and another 30 percent were unsure.
At that point, 58.2 percent of Republicans said they were aware of the controversy.
Polls later revealed Americans to be increasingly skeptical of Obama’s official narrative:
  • A survey by Angus Reid Global Monitor, a division of Vision Critical Group,in October 2009 found three in 10 people in the U.S. believed Obama to be a foreigner.”While only 13 percent of Democratic Party supporters believe Obama was not born in the U.S., the proportion rises to 25 percent among independents and 51 percent among Republican Party backers,” the report said.
  • Then in January 2010, another WND/Wenzel Poll showed on the one-year anniversary of Obama’s tenure in office that fully one-third of Americans refused to believe Obama was a “legitimate
    president,” with another 15.8 percent saying they were not sure.Barely half the voters, 51.5 percent, said they believed the president legitimate even though he had not produced documentation proving his constitutional eligibility. Even 14.6 percent of the
    Democrats said they did not consider him legitimate.
  • In May 2010, a WND/Wenzel Poll showed that 55 percent of Americans wanted Obama to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including “college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation.”"Asked what should be done should it be found that Obama does not meet the qualifications to be president, 59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed,” the poll’s analysis revealed.
  • By June 2010, other media were beginning to put their toes in the waters of the controversy.
    A 60 Minutes-Vanity Fair poll showed only 39 percent of respondents believed Obama was born in Hawaii as he claimed in his book.”A shocking 63 percent – very nearly two-thirds of us – went out on a limb and stated for the record that we believe in the United States. It’s enough to make you proud to be an American – or 63 percent proud, at any rate.”But that figure included those who said they believe he was born in Kansas or some other unknown state, which still would conflict with Obama’s story.
  • In later 2010, a poll by CNN said 6 of 10 people were uncertain Obama was born in the U.S. The poll said only 42 percent believe Obama “definitely” was born in the U.S.The CNN report said, “Hawaii has released a copy of the president’s birth certificate – officially called a ‘certificate of live birth.’ And in 1961 the hospital where the president was born
    placed announcements in two Hawaiian newspapers regarding Obama’s birth.”
See detailed results of survey questions:


Previous stories:

Add New Comment

  • Image
Real-time updating is paused(Resume)

Showing 10 of 102 comments

  • Obama was NOT born in Hawaii, since he has a SS# that was issued for someone who lived in Connecticut and Obama said he never lived there.   Also, the SS# was traced to a person who was born in 1884 and died before Obama was born.   According to Social Security Officials, no one is ever issued a SS# that belonged to a deceased person.  Why is this not being asked of Obama the Socialist/Marxist.  His aunt stated that she was there when Obama was born in Kenya.   Why are the Immigration RECORDS which everyone including returning American Citizens had to fill out when returning to the U.S. missing for the week Obama was born?   Why did 2 hospitals in Honolulu both claim Obama was born there?   Why is his BC number out of Sequence when he was supposedly born a day before twin girls and yet his registration number comes after the Twins?  Why is his BC completely typewritten when the  Liberal Democ  rat women who is in charge...
    show more
  • Obama sent a Lawyer to pick up the what ever was in that envelope and carry it to Washinton. where they put a certificate on the internet.. If the Health Dept. Had put it on the internet it would make sense.We dont have any idea what was in that Envelope. The certificates the twins that were born the day after Obama have are produced from the Microflim, Obamas is not. If we could see the microfilm the number Obama claims as his would have the name Virgina Sunahara on it.The health dept can;t give a certificate to her famiy because it was used to produce Obamas.
  • Only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both citizens of the U.S.) may be president of the United States.  Which means that Obama'a father African Muslim from Kenya married an american citizen his mother.  Furthermore, he was then  adopted by his mother's second husband;
    After her divorce, Dunham married Indonesian Lolo Soetoro, who was attending college in Hawaii. When Suharto, a military leader in Soetoro's home country, came to power in 1967, all Indonesian students studying abroad were recalled, and the family moved to the Menteng neighborhood of Jakarta. Obama's second  father then adopted young Obama in order for him to attend Muslim school.  The only thing is that this was kept under wraps until he was elected as U.S. President then in the Oval Office his administration has done everything in their power to hide this from the U.S. Public making it a criminal act.
  • Of course they are.  Every single one of our politicians are engaging in political theatre.  No doubt they are complicit.  All criminals, not a one can be trusted.
  • 81643
    Corrupt trumps honesty!
  • How can 54% feel so positive that this guy occupying our white house is valid under the Constitution?  They have no proof whatsoever, only this occupier's word, which has been proven worthless.  His background is clearly so questionable, I wouldn't believe him telling me the time of day.  He has done nothing but weaken our country and we're on the brink of economic collapse, of which he has not engineered alone but is an integral component of the manufactured crisis.  Sadly, our country is filled with idiots of the highest order that can't believe the truth right in front of their faces. This same 54% likely would agree that politicians are a bunch of lying thieves, but believe Obama is telling the truth?  Give me a break.   What a bunch of zombie morons.
    Seb27, Congress doesn't investigate because they are complicit.  Everything they do is nothing but political theatre.  Unless our citizenry develops the realization that the entire house and senate and Obama and his thug administration have to be outed and punished for their crimes...
    show more
  • 81643
    The bottom feeders and low lifes have us outnumbered! That's why Oblame-a can NOT be defeated!
  • Hotnike
    All of Obama's documents are fake, as he is a fake.  Why is he so opposed of having his college background brought into the open?  He obviously has a lot to hide.  I believe he applied for and received college funding from applyiny for foriegn student financial aid.  And if people would just open their ears that would be able to hear all the lies that come from his mouth almost everytime he opens his mouth.
  • Of course it's a fake.  If he had a real BC that stated he was actually born in hawaii, he would already provided the documents detailing that.  No, this guy is not a prez, he is not who he says he is, he is hiding his background at all costs, that alone should raise the red flags, instead of a thorough investigation of this con artist, the brain dead minions who worship him wrap themselves up in these red flags as some kind of honor.
    A congressional investigation should be called ASAP!
  • GunTotingLib Just a Liberal following the radical teachings of other great Liberals like Thomas Jefferson and Jesus.
    So we put faith in a poll by Fritz Wenzel,. The man implicated in covering up "coingate" in Ohio long enough for Bush to steal the state for his reelection? Forced out of his Job at the Blade paper to go to work for the far right wing  Ohio Republican congresswoman "Mean"Jean Schmidt? This is a FAIR poll ? Really guys? Really? WOW?

No comments:

Post a Comment