Thursday, November 22, 2012

Feds open investigation into Obama money

Feds open investigation into Obama money


Federal investigators confirmed an investigation has been opened into allegations that Barack Obama’s re-election campaign stuffed its war chest with illegal donations.
Jeff Jordan, a supervisory attorney for the Federal Election Commission, wrote in a letter that the complaint had been received and that the Obama campaign will be notified.
“You will be notified as soon as the Federal Election Commission takes final action on your complaint,” he said.
WND reported that details of alleged illegal activity were provided to the federal overseers.
The complaint sent to the FEC in Washington cited the Obama for America campaign and treasurer Martin H. Nesbitt. It is signed by Joseph Farah, founder and CEO of WND.com, which has been running a series of stories about the controversy.
The complaint alleged the Obama campaign systematically violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 as well as the regulations of the FEC, specifically by “soliciting, processing, accepting and confirming contributions from foreign nationals and non-U.S. citizens” in contravention of federal law.
The complaint argues it is unlawful for a foreign national to directly or indirectly make a contribution of money or to promise a contribution of money in connection with a federal, state or local election.
It also is illegal for a person to accept or receive such a contribution.
“Notwithstanding the clear legal prohibitions against soliciting and accepting foreign contributions, the Obama campaign has repeatedly and willfully ignored the law in order to amass a vast campaign war chest, primarily of non-disclosed donors,” the complaint states.
“Reports have increasingly noted evidence of the Obama campaign’s unwillingness and continued failure to install the safeguards used by other campaigns, such as the Romney for President campaign, as well as to utilize industry standard protections against illegal contributions.”
It was documented that “Osama bin Laden” used a Pakistani proxy server to run a grassroots fundraising page titled “Fatwa: Foreign Donations” on Obama’s campaign website, which openly sought foreign donations.
“Bin Laden’s” foreign donors page was not removed by the Obama campaign after a WND report prior to the election exposed how the same “bin Laden” account had successfully donated twice to Obama’s presidential re-election campaign. After the WND report, one of the donations was officially returned while another was listed as pending.
The “bin Laden” foreign donors page was still active even after “bin Laden” sent an email to the Obama campaign alerting them to the page.
The email concerned a campaign competition for supporters who had donated $3 to meet President Obama on Election Day. “Bin Laden” had donated the $3 for the competition and had asked the campaign in the email whether he could bring wanted al-Qaida leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri as a guest. The email also provided a link to “bin Laden’s” grassroots page seeking foreign donations.
“Bin Laden’s” page was set up by WND staff as a test after media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign.
The test was also in response to a nonprofit group’s report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
The FEC complaint notes that stories about Obama’s acceptance of donations from foreigners arose during the 2008 election, when Newsweek, the Washington Post and ABC News all cited such claims.
In the past few months, the complaint said, “there have been increasing published reports of individuals making contributions to the Obama campaign using foreign names and/or addresses, foreign IP addresses and many other serious breaches of security that would have prevented such contributions. ”
The reports have been cited in RedState.com, the Washington Examiner and other publications.
Farah explained “to ascertain whether the other published reports were true or exaggerated,” his news staff “planned and executed transactions using clearly bogus names, addresses, and, in particular, a foreign (Pakistani) Internet protocol address.”
For example, a $15 donor came from Osama bin Laden of 911 Jihad Way, Abbottabad, Calif. His occupation was listed as deceased terror chief and his employer was al-Qaida.
“The contribution from this source, with this information, to the Obama campaign was accepted and the disposable credit card was charged the amount of $15.00,” the complaint explains. “We then conducted the same transaction with the Romney for President campaign. The attempted contribution was rejected immediately.”
Other donations that should have been rejected were made to Obama, to make certain the first donation was not an anomalous result.
“Clearly, the Obama campaign is more concerned with fundraising than in abiding by federal law,” the complaint said. “The Obama campaign has made it clear that despite the multiple stories confirming illegal foreign contributions to the campaign, it has no intention of establishing the safeguards necessary to halt the flow of illegal funds into his campaign coffers.”
Said the complaint, “It is well past time for the Federal Election Commission to conduct an audit of the Obama campaign to ascertain, once and for all, the extent of the foreign and illegal funding of the Obama presidential campaign.”
In an attached affidavit, Farah explained that the Obama donation system was set “to accept all credit card contributions, regardless of source or other information.”
“From WND.com’s own investigative and reporting experience in 2008, we established that Palestinians in Gaza successfully donated to the 2008 Obama campaign. Only after our story was published and the illegal contributions reported did the Obama campaign claim to refund the money. WND.com has … been unable to verify that claim by the Obama campaign from 2008,” he explained. “With no safeguards against illegal foreign campaign contributions, and absent a forensic audit of the Obama campaign’s fundraising by a government agency or an independent auditor, there is no way to know the extent of the funds raised illegally by the Obama campaign, including from non-US citizens. ”
He noted the Obama campaign refuses to release the names of donors who give less than $200, the threshold for required disclosure.
Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.

Add New Comment

@SirJack74
  • Image
  • Share on:

    Twitter
Real-time updating is enabled(Pause)

Showing 20 of 394 comments

  • Another investigation that will go no where.  Any evidence they find will be turned on its head by personal attacks, slander and character assassinations...Just ask Joe Arapaio!
  • karolh
    There is so much underhanded, dishonest, illegal crap going on with our voting system by the democrates, I think We The People need to get together with groups like WND and demand the courts do something about this.  That 30 year old court case against the republicans needs to be done away with.  The people involved in that are not even around anymore.  They can not hold every generation responsible for what others did. We have no proof that the republicans actually did try to suppress the votes, and what I have seen out of the democrats over the past 20 years I certianly would not take their word for anything.  I am sure WND knows of a good lawyer that would handle this for the people as a pro bono.  There is probably a lawyer that even posts on here that would join with us and help get some of this stopped. If they would not take the case for pro bono, every member would have to chip in $10 or $15 to pay their bill.  We...
    show more
  • ArtF
    Does anybody actually believe that the Federal Elections Commission will do anything with this other than stuff it in a drawer for at least the next 4 years?  The crack FBI ran investigations and slander campaigns on people like Joe Arpaio for over 4 years, probably at the insistence of Janet Napolitano.  After 4 years the FBI finally said there was "no evidence of wrong doing against Joe Arpaio".  This is the Federal government folks, and all of these people bend over and grab their ankles when Barack Hussein Obama tells them to.  The FEC is no different.  If it was, Bill and Hillary would have been in jail for accepting donations from Communist China agents.
  • karolh
    ArtF, yes I think something will be done this time.  It is the WND that donated the money and is following the money.  They have proven fraud and can prove it.  So the FEC has to look into this.  Also, there are several more that did something similiar, so it will be pretty hard to keep from investigating.  In an earlier post of mine, is with the moderator right now, the voter fraud of machines turning Romney's votes for Obama, also was witnessed by by the people while it was happening, since there are quite a few in, I think 7 or 8 states, that too would be investigated if the people follow through.  Problem is, no one actually follows throught.  Therefore, Obama and Democrats get by with everything.
  • WilliamSpires
    We have heard all of the crap before. Big deal the piece of crap Federal Election Commission will investigate. If they were worth a bent nail then we wouldn't be in this mess because Obama would have never been in office in 2008. There have been cases of fraud and illegal action for the last 4 years and they are ignored by agencies that are responsible. So color me EXTREMELY SKEPTICAL and we will see but I refuse to get my hopes up as the country has been let down so many times. I would be delighted if for once justice is served but time will tell.
  • Paul Brown
    What are the Feds going to do with this illegal muslim pig thief, are they going to fine him, make him give the money back. I don't think so because he will thumb his nose at us and say, KISS OFF  and no body will do a damn thing as always because the courts and the Judges are in his pocket and they haven't got the guts to do anything....they probably voted for him anyway. If they did " Fine" him, he will only ask for donations from his supportors to pay the fine, just likw Hillary did when she racked up alot of campaign bills and didn't have the money to pay, she ask for help from the people and theey were stupid enough to send her money.
  • bhudda
    2008 all over again . Rev up the engine and make noise but idle back to the garage for another 4 yrs . This should have been stopped when the first alligation was made not after the election . . Really fair that Romney plays fair and Obama cheats . Now you liberal *** explain to your children the difference between right and wrong . Explain the rewards of being right and the consequences of being wrong . I don't hear you !!!! 
    (Edited by a moderator)
  • nomoremarxistsindc
    Why is that Democrats and Obombo can violate Federal election laws but Republicans can't challenge voter fraud by Democrats (even though Dems can challenge Republicans) because of a 40 year old court consent order issued by a Federal Appellate Judge appointed by Democrats??????
    The Republicans should thumb their nose at the order, and say what President Andrew Jackson said to the Supreme Court:
    In a popular quotation, President Andrew Jackson is supposed to have said: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!". This derives from Jackson's consideration on the case in a letter to John Coffee, "...the decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate," (that is, the Court's opinion was moot because it had no power to enforce its edict).
    The Federal courts would not dare try to enforce their order against one political party at this juncture, without facing huge retribution.
  • nomoremarxistsindc
    The Democrats can violate Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 as well as the regulations of the FEC, specifically by “soliciting, processing, accepting and confirming contributions from foreign nationals and non-U.S. citizens” in contravention of federal law, but don't let Republicans violate a vague and amorphous court consent order saying that they cannot challenge voter fraud in Democrat campaigns?!?!?!?!?!?  Huh??????
    It's time for Republicans to grow a set and tell the Federal courts to go pound salt about not being able to challenge Demcrats on voter fraud (even though Democrats can challenge Republicans on voter fraud) through some ***. court order. 
    In Worcester v. Georgia, President Andrew Jackson is supposed to have said: "John
    Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!". This derives from
    Jackson's consideration on the case in a letter to John Coffee, "...the
    decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they
    cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate," (that is, the Court's
    opinion was moot because it had no power to...
    show more
    (Edited by a moderator)
  • CaptTurbo
    It's great to hear that an audit might be done but I would make a good wager that the results will be lost or corrupted.
  • nomoremarxistsindc
    Why is that Democrats and Obombo can violate Federal election laws but Republicans can't challenge voter fraud by Democrats (even though Dems can challenge Republicans) because of a 40 year old court consent order issued by a Federal Appellate Judge appointed by Democrats?????? 
    The Republicans should thumb their nose at the order, and say what President Andrew Jackson said to the Supreme Court: 
    In a popular quotation, President Andrew Jackson is supposed to have said: "John
    Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!". This derives from
    Jackson's consideration on the case in a letter to John Coffee, "...the
    decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they
    cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate," (that is, the Court's
    opinion was moot because it had no power to enforce its edict).
    The Federal courts would not dare try to enforce their order against one political party at this juncture, without facing huge retribution.
  • am a tax payer tried of are country falling ,with no pride any more. grand children liveing at home ,29 and 25 how can their person save for old age . my son's 401 and banks pay 1 per cent help working and fixed income people,have can the little people make it . do not when wefare. tells get it together americans need help.??????
  • am happy to see he is not god they see , what is happen in americans ,we the people not the goverment is answering to american tax payer .
  • anAmericanMom
    Because Americans live in Israel. . . As opposed to the Non Americans voting here and living off America.
  • reaper
    So why was Ronmey in Israel raising money...? Oh, that's right: It's ok because Israel is a proxy state....You guys really puch a lot of BS sometimes....  :-(
  • karolh
    He had a fund raiser dinner in Israel for the Americans over there.  Israeli citizens could not donate to him.  Check it out, that question was asked and answered while Romney was in Israel.
  • Richard Calvert
    So says the grim reaper of lies!
  • historyguy48 I am a student of history, an author of many novels, and a conservative! My historical interests span just about every facet of human history and I usually read two to three books a week even though I write an average of seven hours a day.
     He wasn't.

No comments:

Post a Comment